|
CSRA
The Continuous Period of Institutionalization determination is only used in regard to couples covered by the spousal impoverishment rules. The Continuous Period of Institutionalization determines the effective date of CSRA and the $35 LTC Maintenance Need.
Note: Once the institutionalized spouse leaves the LTC facility, the CSRA rules no longer apply and property must be re-evaluated.
A Community Spouse, for purposes of establishing the CSRA, is in his/her own MFBU at the beginning of the Continuous Period of Institutionalization.
Calculation of the CSRA
The CSRA is calculated by combining the net non-exempt separate and community property, belonging to either or both the Institutionalized and Community Spouse when:
- The Institutionalized Spouse is expected to remain in care for 30 consecutive days.
- The Institutionalized Spouse applies for MC.
Note: The CSRA can be applied to 3-month retroactive MC as long as the couple meets the definitions of Community Spouse and Institutionalized Spouse in the retroactive months and their combined net non-exempt property does not exceed the CSRA plus the property limit for one person, for at least one day in each of the retroactive months.
Maximum CSRA
The maximum CSRA is the greatest of:
- The CSRA amount established by DHCS which is adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index, or
- An amount established by a court order, or
- An amount awarded through a fair hearing.
Court Order
The CSRA amount can be established by a court order as of the date of, or specified in the court order if the order is “against the Institutionalized Spouse” for the support of the Community Spouse or family member.
- If the Maximum CSRA is established by a court order, use the value of the property as of the date of the order. Disregard any increases in the value of such property when determining eligibility.
- Do not use the court ordered amount if the net market value of the property has since decreased and is now worth less than the other two CSRA options (Maximum CSRA or Fair Hearing amount).
- An application must remain pending if a court order for support is being sought and the couple provides verification.
Note: Federal law cites a pending court order as an exception to the 45-day processing rule for MC.
Fair Hearing
A fair hearing Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will only increase the CSRA amount when additional property is needed to produce income up to the Minimum Monthly Maintenance Need Allowance (MMMNA). When calculating the necessary CSRA increase, the ALJ must first consider the total income available to the Community Spouse prior to determining the amount of property adequate to provide the difference between the MMMNA and all income available to the Community Spouse. Total income available includes the net non-exempt income of the Institutionalized Spouse that can be allocated to the Community Spouse and the Community Spouse’s own separate income.
Total Property
In order for the Institutionalized Spouse to be eligible, the couple's net nonexempt property must not exceed the Maximum CSRA amount plus the property limit for one.
If their total property. . . |
Then. . . |
Is less than or equal to the Maximum CSRA, |
The property total is the CSRA. |
Exceeds the Maximum CSRA |
The Community Spouse receives the Maximum CSRA, the excess is included in the property reserve of the Institutionalized Spouse, and the Institutionalized Spouse is not eligible until his/her property is less than or equal to the property reserve for one. |
A CSRA Approval or Denial NOA must be issued explaining what property was counted, how the CSRA was determined, and must define the transfer period.
Transfer of the CSRA to the Community Spouse
The Institutionalized Spouse must transfer into the Community Spouse’s name, all or any portion of the CSRA which:
- Is not already the separate property of the Community Spouse, or
- is not already held solely in the name of the Community Spouse.
Transfer Period
The transfer period begins on the date of the initial determination of eligibility and continues through whichever comes first:
- The end of the month in which the transfer(s) occur, OR
- The end of the month in which the 90 days ends, OR
- The end of the month in which a court enters an order which is necessary to accomplish the transfer. (A probate court order may be needed to accomplish the transfer.)
The property which is included in the CSRA is not considered available to the Institutionalized Spouse during the transfer period. At the end of the transfer period, all of the net non-exempt property still remaining in the name of the Institutionalized Spouse or property which is still community property, must be considered available to the Institutionalized Spouse and be included in the property reserve.
Note: Discontinue the Institutionalized Spouse with a proper 10-day NOA if there is excess property, unless there is undue hardship.
Adding to the CSRA
Once the separate CSRA has been established at application, the Community Spouse can continue to add to the CSRA with no impact to the Institutionalized Spouse. New non-exempt property acquired by the Community Spouse and held in his/her name only is not considered available to the Institutionalized Spouse.
Exception: If there is a break in aid and the Institutionalized Spouse reapplies for MC, then a new CSRA determination would include all of the couple’s property (including the new non-exempt property acquired by the Community Spouse) as of the date of the re-application month.
Undue Hardship for Establishing CSRA
If property is considered to be legally unavailable without the signature of the Community Spouse, then undue hardship exists.
Important: Evidence of undue hardship is required. (i.e., statement from financial institution). Completion of a CSF 2 alone is not sufficient.
Undue hardship exists when:
- The Institutionalized Spouse is otherwise eligible except for the excess property, AND
- He/she is unable to obtain medical care without MC, AND
- The whereabouts of the Community Spouse is unknown or there has been a break in marital ties and the community spouse/same-sex spouse/RDP refuses to cooperate. There must be some evidence of refusal to cooperate (i.e., copies of letters written to or from the Community Spouse).
Married vs. Separated for Purposes of Applying CSRA
For purposes of applying the CSRA and Community Spouse income only, a couple is considered to be married until the marriage is dissolved or annulled. A legal separation still entitles to the individuals to the CSRA plus the property limit for one. In addition, the Institutionalized Spouse may still provide the income allocation to the Community Spouse, however, the EW must use the criteria listed above to document when “undue hardship” exists.
EW Actions in Determining CSRA
The following steps must be taken when determining the CSRA:
- Verify the Continuous Period of Institutionalization
- Verify the property and calculate the CSRA.
- Set a Follow up Task in CalSAWS and document in the Journal page indicating the 90th day for follow-up.
- Send a specific CSRA Property NOA whenever MC is:
- Approved,
- Denied due to net non-exempt property in excess of the CSRA plus the property limit for one,
- Discontinued because the transfer has not occurred by the end of the transfer period and the client has not submitted evidence of undue hardship.
CSRA Examples
CSRA Includes Separate Property of Community Spouse
An individual is applying for MC in June on behalf of her husband. He has been in a nursing home since February. The couple had a total of $152,000 in assets at the time he went into a nursing home. Of this amount, $101,480 is an inheritance from her mother, which she has always maintained separately. To date, the couple has used $31,200 (for nursing home care and a new car).
All available net non-exempt property in June is combined:
$101,480 |
Savings (separate property of wife) |
+ 20,000 |
Community property |
$121,480 |
Total NET NONEXEMPT PROPERTY |
- 120,900 |
Maximum CSRA, effective 1/1/17 |
$580 |
(Under property limit for one, NO excess property) |
The husband is eligible and the couple has 90 days to remove his name from the $19,420 of property ($120,900 CSRA - $101,480 which is already in the wife’s name).
Court Order
The Stuarts divided their property pursuant to a court order for the support of Mr. Stuart when Mrs. Stuart went into a nursing home due to Alzheimer's disease on 1/10/15. The court order states that each is to receive $100,000 of their community property plus their own separate property. Mr. Stuart had $50,000 in IRAs which he purchased prior to their marriage. Mrs. Stuart has $10,000 from a prior marriage, maintained in a separate account.
On 3/15/17 he is applying for MC on behalf of his wife as her property is now down to $2,000. Mr. Stuart still has his separate property as awarded by the court, ($100,000 + $50,000 in IRAs).
Mrs. Stuart is eligible. In this example the maximum CSRA is the court-ordered amount as of the date of application.
Undue Hardship Exists
Mrs. Groves is admitted to a nursing home on 7/1/17 and her sister applies for MC on her behalf on 7/15/17. Mrs. Groves had $10,000 and used $8,000 to pay off the mortgage of her exempt home.
IEVS reveals that there is interest income from a 20 year C.D. which is in the name of Mr. and Mrs. Groves. Mr. Groves has been absent for four years and she doesn't know where he is now. The bank provides verification that the C.D. cannot be liquidated without both signatures.
Mrs. Groves is eligible as there has been a break in marital ties. There is undue hardship as Mr. Groves' whereabouts are unknown.
Related Topics
Continuous Period of Institutionalization