|
|
Medi-Cal Eligibility
One of the Social Services Benefits Specialist (SSBS)'s responsibilities is to explore actual and potential Medi-Cal needs of each client and assist the client in arranging for needed health care from the appropriate sources.
Frequently, there are instances in which cash aid is not authorized until the month following the month of application. Even though cash is not authorized until the second month, Medi-Cal should be authorized for that initial month, if eligible.
Retro Medi-Cal
As part of the Intake process, the SSBS is responsible for exploring the possibility of retro Medi-Cal needs, which may have occurred within 3 months prior to the date of application/reapplication.
| If the applicant... | Then the SSBS... |
| Has incurred medical treatment within that time, | Must offer to take a retro Medi-Cal application. Use the Supplement to Statement of Facts for Retroactive Coverage/Restoration (MC 210 A). |
| Does not wish to apply for retro Medi-Cal, | Should have an Application Withdrawal/Cancellation (SCD 166) signed and imaged into the case. Document the client declined retro Medi-Cal benefits in the Journal Detail page of CalSAWS. |
"Ex Parte" Review
"Ex parte" means that the Medi-Cal-Only eligibility determination is made based on the information contained in the case record without the involvement of the clients, unless the SSBS cannot make an accurate determination of Medi-Cal eligibility during the "ex parte" process due to insufficient information/verification. All reasonable efforts must be made by only using information/verification from ALL case information available (i.e., CalFresh, General Assistance, Foster Care, In Home Supportive Services (IHSS), Medi-Cal, etc.).
Medi-Cal coverage under Edwards v. Kizer (aid code 38) must be continued during the "ex parte" review process, during which time, individuals must be evaluated for ongoing Medi-Cal and transferred to the appropriate Medi-Cal program.
Exception: When a CalWORKs case is denied at intake and an "ex parte" review is required, the case is NOT set up on Edwards v. Kizer. Follow the "ex parte" time frames.
"Ex Parte" Review Required
The "ex parte" review process will now be utilized for all of the following:
- Cases in Edwards v. Kizer status
- CalWORKs denials/discontinuances
- Diversion approvals/denials
- Medi-Cal annual redeterminations.
"Ex Parte" Review NOT Required
No "ex parte" review is necessary when persons are discontinued from CalWORKs for one of the following reasons:
- Death
- Recipient’s written request to discontinue Medi-Cal benefits
- Incarceration
- Loss of California residency
- The individual is transitioning into another Public Assistance (PA) program that provides Medi-Cal benefits.
Note: Other family members in the case must be reviewed for ongoing Medi-Cal eligibility.
Information Sources
Information/verification available to the SSBS through the following resources must be used in the "ex parte" process when determining Medi-Cal eligibility:
- Income Eligibility Verification System (IEVS)
- Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements System (SAVE)
- Employment Development Department (EDD)/State Disability Insurance (SDI)
- State Data Exchange (SDX)
- Beneficiary Data Exchange (BENDEX).
Cash Aid Denied
The SSBS must make every effort to determine eligibility for Medi-Cal Only benefits when the:
- CalWORKs application is denied
- Diversion application is approved or denied
- Applicant has withdrawn the CalWORKs application.
In situations where cash applicants do not qualify for cash aid, Medi-Cal eligibility must be explored. Refer to the CalWORKs Denials section of Medi-Cal Handbook Loss of Contact.
Cash Aid Discontinued
Appropriate actions must be taken for all discontinued CalWORKs cases.
| If... | Then... |
| CalWORKs is discontinued, |
Refer to:
|
| A Medi-Cal case is in Edwards v. Kizer status, |
Complete an "ex parte" review and transfer individuals to the appropriate programs prior to MEDS Cut-Off of the second Edwards v. Kizer month. Reminder: Do not allow cases to remain in Edwards v. Kizer status longer than two months. |
Evaluation Chart
The chart below describes the appropriate action required when CalWORKs is discontinued:
| Reason For CalWORKs Discontinuance | Section 1931(b) | Edwards v. Kizer | "Ex Parte" Review Required |
| Failure to provide the SAR 7 | Yes | No | No |
|
Non-cooperation with the following requirements:
|
Yes | No | No |
|
Excluded because the individual is:
|
Yes | No | No |
| Expiration of CalWORKs time limits | Yes | No | No |
| Failure to complete the CalWORKs redetermination (RD) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Loss of contact/whereabouts unknown | No | Yes | Yes |
| The only eligible child leaves the home | No | Yes | Yes |
| Change in household composition that has resulted in non-cooperation with the information gathering requirements for the CalWORKs Assistance Unit (AU) | No | Yes | Yes |
| Change in household circumstances that affect Medi-Cal eligibility | No | Yes | Yes |
| Property exceeds the limits | No | Yes | Yes |
| Income exceeds the limits | No | Yes | Yes |
| Failure to cooperate with child support requirements | No | Yes | Yes |
Transfer to Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal
The implementation of welfare reform, January 1, 1998, de-linked the CalWORKs and Medi-Cal programs and created the Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal Program. When CalWORKs is approved, Medi-Cal eligibility under Section 1931(b) is established. However, a discontinuance of CalWORKs benefits does not always mean discontinuance from Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal is appropriate.
Persons who are discontinued from CalWORKs must continue to receive ongoing Medi-Cal benefits under Section 1931(b) when the CalWORKs discontinuance reason does NOT affect Medi-Cal eligibility.
CalWORKs cases discontinued for reasons that do not affect Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal program eligibility must continue eligibility until the next annual RD. These cases must not be allowed to convert into Edwards v. Kizer. The following reasons DO NOT affect ongoing Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal eligibility, and discontinuance is NOT appropriate.
- Non-cooperation with the following requirements:
- Identification
- Immunization
- School attendance
- WTW participation.
- Excluded because the individual is:
- A fleeing felon
- Convicted of an IPV
- Failure to provide the SAR 7
- Expiration of the 60-month time limit for receipt of CalWORKs benefits.
Note: Incomplete SAR 7s must be evaluated for the appropriate action. If the incomplete/missing information only affects CalWORKs eligibility and does not affect ongoing Medi-Cal eligibility, then the case must be converted to Section 1931(b).
CalWORKs cases discontinued for reasons that affect the Section 1931(b) Medi-Cal program eligibility will be converted into Edwards v. Kizer. After Edwards v. Kizer, the SSBS must determine ongoing Medi-Cal eligibility by completing an “ex parte” review.
Edwards v. Kizer Medi-Cal
When a CalWORKs case is discontinued, the case is automatically converted to Edwards v. Kizer (aid code 38) by the fifth working day of the following month.
Edwards v. Kizer continues to be a “transitional” program for persons discontinued from CalWORKs. However, the completion of an Edwards v. Kizer packet is NO LONGER REQUIRED for continuation of Medi-Cal. Instead, an ex-parte review is required for discontinued CalWORKs cases that are in Edwards v. Kizer Medi-Cal.
Note: Foster Care must use the Medi-Cal Renewal Form (MC 210 RV) in the Edwards v. Kizer process.
CalWORKs cases discontinued due to "Loss of Contact/Whereabouts Unknown" must continue under Edwards v. Kizer, and an "ex parte" review is required.
Procedures for Cases in Edwards v. Kizer Status
Follow the procedures below for discontinued CalWORKs cases:
| Reason for CalWORKs Discontinuance | Required Action |
| Failure to complete the annual CalWORKs RD |
Refer to:
|
| Increase in income | Evaluate for Section 1931(b), TMC, Four-month Continuing, FPL Programs, CEC or AFDC-MN/MI. |
| Loss of contact/whereabouts unknown (returned mail) |
|
| The only eligible child leaves the home | Review for linkage under all other Medi-Cal aid categories, including disability. If the client alleges disability, send a referral to Disability Determination Service Division (DDSD). If no linkage exists, discontinue with a 10-day NOA. |
|
A change in household composition that results in non-cooperation with CalWORKs AU requirements |
Attempt to obtain information and/or verification necessary for an accurate eligibility determination. The reason for contacting the individual must be documented in the Journal Detail page of CalSAWS. |
Annual Medi-Cal RD
The next Medi-Cal annual RD date will remain unchanged from the CalWORKs RD date, and should be no earlier than 12 months from the date of the most recent CalWORKs annual RD. If no such annual CalWORKs RD has been conducted, then the next Medi-Cal annual RD date will be 12 months from the date cash aid was granted.
Clients Alleging Disability
When an individual discontinued from CalWORKs or Medi-Cal alleges that they are disabled, and there is no other basis for ongoing eligibility, the SSBS must continue Medi-Cal benefits and pursue linkage by initiating a referral to DDSD. Refer to Medi-Cal Handbook Chapter 17 DDSD for complete information.
Important: Verification of Incapacitated Parent deprivation does not necessarily mean disability criteria exist.
Request for Information
When there is insufficient information on file to determine ongoing Medi-Cal eligibility, the SSBS must first contact the client by phone to request the needed information. If the phone contact is unsuccessful, the SSBS must send a written request using the MC 355, which includes an informational cover letter required by Senate Bill (SB) 87.
Reminder: The written request for information/verification must NEVER be combined with a discontinuance NOA.
The SSBS may not request information/verification from clients that:
- Has been provided within the last 12 months
- Is not subject to change (i.e., Identification, Social Security Card, etc.)
- Is available for verification by the SSBS
- Is not necessary for completing a Medi-Cal eligibility determination.
Note: This includes information/verification currently on file in ALL active case records of the individual and their immediate family members and/or any case records that have been closed within the last 45 days.
Follow the procedures below if additional information is needed in order to determine ongoing Medi-Cal eligibility. The exact reason for contacting the client must be documented in the Journal Detail page of CalSAWS.
| If... | Then... |
| The SSBS is unable to make an accurate eligibility determination through the "ex parte" process, | An attempt must be made to reach the family by phone to request the necessary information/verification. |
| The "ex parte" process and attempted phone call are unsuccessful, | Send the MC 355 requesting the information needed to complete the Medi-Cal eligibility review. |
| The individual fails to respond to the request for information or does not provide the necessary information/verification within the required time frames listed below, | Evaluate for other Medi-Cal program eligibility without the additional information/verification (i.e., Property Waiver Program). |
Note: MC 355 is used to request additional information/verification if the SSBS cannot make an accurate Medi-Cal eligibility determination through the “ex parte” process. The MC 355 is NOT used in place of the MC 210 RV or the SAWS 2 Plus. Completion of an MC 210 RV is required for CalWORKs cases discontinued for failure to complete the annual RD. Completion of the SAWS 2 Plus is required at intake to conduct an "ex parte" review.
Exhausting All Avenues of Eligibility
When conducting a review of eligibility caused by a change in circumstances, the SSBS must consider eligibility under ALL possible aid categories, beginning with no share-of-cost Medi-Cal categories.
Reminder: Children are protected under CEC if the "ex parte" review reveals a change in circumstances resulting in a share-of-cost or ineligibility for Medi-Cal, until the next annual RD or their 19th birthday, whichever occurs first.
If, after completion of the "ex parte" process, eligibility under all categories fails, the SSBS must send an MC 355 explaining that new information/verification, such as pregnancy, incapacity, or disability, may provide a potential basis for eligibility, which was not apparent in the "ex parte" review.
Related Topics
Verification Needed to Establish Eligibility
Loss of Contact/Whereabouts Unknown
Determining County of Responsibility
Client Resides in Another County